Highres fix denoising strength reddit. quick fix if/when UI's integrate the SD 2.

Highres fix denoising strength reddit But I result vs low denoising strength vs high Using high denoising strength. Use brand names with reduced strength (with square However, to fix this, you could test different upscaling models as the outputs can change drastically. then 1. 5, Seed: 309755534, Size: 512x768, Model hash: fc2511737a, Denoising strength: 0. I used 40 steps originally so I used 130 to give around the same number. 2 and 0. 5 (play with it) you should find it holds together much better. /r/StableDiffusion is back open after the protest of Reddit killing open API access, which will bankrupt app developers, hamper moderation, and exclude blind users from the site. You can also change the prompt. But if you tried highres fix and your image is totally different, it because your denoising strength is too high. (use to give 17it/s) but all type of extra processes takes a lot of VRAM. And another SD Denoising: The Image Cleanup Crew. fix setting left is the Denoising Strength. Generally, non-latent upscalers had no lower limit for Denoising needed whereas latent need at least 0. 45 denoising is indeed better than 0. 45 denoising to double. 7, Clip skip: 2, ENSD: 31337, First pass size: 576x768 I honestly forgot about being able /r/StableDiffusion is back open after the protest of Reddit killing open API access, which will bankrupt app developers, hamper moderation, and exclude blind users from the site. Then SD Upscale at 0. Since Highres fix is more time consuming operation and does generate different image than when you create a 512 x 512 image - at what point do you choose one over the Highres. And like Shap6 said, this feature is to allow you to go into higher resolutions without getting repeating characters, heads growing out of I just started using stable diffusion so my knowledge is limited. Use the same seed as your base img. You will see radiogroup titled Conditioning Highres. Maybe a miss click or something I didn't see myself do, or like you said a bug in the new Cool! Glad you can run it now, BTW, I still haven't found much difference when running the high res fix, I mean, you can still get double headed characters even with it turned on, although I've found it can do wonders if you lower the denoising, like make the final image a little bit more detailed, sadly the opposite can occur as well, but it varies from one type of image to the next The default appear to be a Denoising strength of around 0. 5 again. SD 1. I believe it is very good for highres-fix: it fully prevents object duplication, it sharpens the image and adds details without oversaturating it. 45. This is because the image has more noise to resolve. And do not use any sampler with a "a" like Euler a. 50 and above) more Hi-Res steps have a much bigger effect. 2) or something? A biiig question about hi-res fix. 25, Token merging ratio hr: 0. If you want to use a lower denoise value to stay close to the original, then don't use latent upscale, choose one of the image-based upscale choices. 3 makes fewer alterations to the original picture. 3, 512*512, CFG scale 7 to 8 and 80 steps for Euler a. If Highres-Fix changes up the image too much, use the SD-Upscale script in the img2img tab with a denoising strength of < 0. 25 and 4x-UltraSharp (put this in models/ESRGAN) to double again. The latent upscalers add additional detail, but it's a gamble because denoising strengths that high will produce significant changes in your original image. It works the same way, but the value is inverted. We will compare 4 upscalers (two latent and two non-latent) with different denoising strengths. fix denoising, low steps and prompt wide emphasis to create texture. Long story short, the appropriate denoising level depends on upscaling amount and subject matter. 1, Hires You may need to reduce "Denoising strength" for the SD Upscale if you're getting odd artefacts. Sort by: Best. Try different sample counts and highres fix. Denoising strength 0. Which always seems to end up totally messing with the nice 512x512 image I started with. 55 denoising /r/StableDiffusion is back open after the protest of Reddit killing open API access, which will bankrupt app developers, hamper moderation, and exclude blind users from the site. 5 when generating over 512 on the initial image generation Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now What about the other Highres. This helps to produce more natural-looking results. Higher denoise value = more Highres fix steps. What hires fix does: create image at set resolution with regular given parameters upscale the result using a configurable upscaler (like 4x-ultrasharp) run the upscaled result through SD again, using a second set of parameters, i. to combat it you must increase the denoising value of any sampler you feed an upscale into. Click "Generate" and you'll get a 2x upscale (for example, 512x becomes 1024x). This essentially sets how strongly the upscaler effects image generation. I get better background characters (others get worse, like the guy with the white shirt or the one with the black jacket, but mostly, the background stuff in the image improves overall), but the main subject always gets destroyed. that'll get you a nice-sized image without duplicates (most of the time) that you can upscale if you like the contents, to the top resolution you want. However, 0. Try using a non-latent upscaler with a lower denoising View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. It depends on the goal but it can be useful to just start with a ton of low resolution images to find a nicely composed image first. It uses the latent upscaler with 0. 3 in terms of pixel quality. Does highres. The best example is if you compare UltraMix With increasing denoising strength, the content of the image changes enormously. fix, denoising strength` method, you have to try and mix things like Upscaler, I don't like the way ComfyUI works, although nowadays it is very easy to install and it is very fast creating images, I think the only thing that fails is the Hires fix. If it's taking too many liberties with your image, turn down the denoising strength. That being said, it is a bit faster, but produces more artifacts. 35 (use ultrasharp or esrgan upscaler or any that you like), then img2img with controlnet and sd ultimate upscale: Denoising strength: 0. fix upscale method. Low values lead to very few steps, and little change. 5 to 1. different steps, different denoising strength What does the LoRA strength clip function do? If the clip is the text or trigger word, isn't it the same to put (loratriggerword:1. For example, complicated images like say black and white drawing of a mansion get messed up at lower denoising than simple things like a face. Low denoising strength should result in images more similar to the exploratory smaller-resolution image. fix settings? Denosing strength, Hires steps, Upscaler and Upscale by? I did not change any of them. I use Absolutereality too. fix: Disabled (none) is selected – nothing will be done. any way to fix blurriness at low denoising strength? Question | Help /r/StableDiffusion is back open after the protest of Reddit killing open API access, which will bankrupt app developers, hamper moderation, and exclude blind users from the site. 1 I get double mouths/noses. I don't know if this is because of the latent upscaler action (since some sources say it What upscaler and denoising strength are you using? What's your initial resolution? I use swinIR. But if I try to upscale in img2img using either SD upscale or Ultimate SD upscale, either I have to set the denoising strength too low and no additional detail/sharpening is added, or if I set it too high some detail is added but now the gorilla's nipples turn into eyeballs and his fingers Yes, I technically upscaled it using Highres fix, you should see it near the width/height slider (assuming you are using AUTOMATIC1111's web UI) The only thing I might have different is Denoising Strength, as I have no idea where to put that. You can manually override this by specifying the exact amount of steps for normal, then highres. The only setting with which the upscale bears a close resemblance to the previous image is a denoising strength of Higher Denoising Strength increases variation and reduces the influence of your input image on your output image, which makes high values useful for significant modifications. 4 wile the same picture in karras would need 0. 5 denoising strength. /r/StableDiffusion is back open after the protest of Reddit killing open API access, which Use hires fix at 2. Going forward, I will use this option as intended, typically using low denoise and only running it on the images I want to enlarge. After I posted I went through each setting one by on and I found the problem just before i went to bed somehow my denoising setting on highres had got set to 0. 1, Hires Hires is a second pass with its own number of steps, denoising strength, upscaling, etc. for SD 1. BlastedRemnants • I don't understand why you're even The final HiRes. You can even use a denoising strength of 1 without affecting the final image, and try different samplers to get extra details. Then click on option "just resize latent upscale". So there you have it, how to perform a “Hires fix” in ComfyUI. 6-0-7 for best results It's easier to Control than highres fix, and you can balance the creation of new detail with 2 parameters, weight and ending step, as opposed to just denoising strength. Let me know if the workflow is stripped on Reddit. try to use 0. Scale x2, ESRGANx4 model and denoise set at 0. 5X and denoise about 0. 5 denoise works very nice. Automatic1111 settings. 42 Denoising I already seen various workflows like this. 25, and that's enough to fix faces and eyes most of the time. Highres Fix vs. 3, Version: v1. 40), 15 steps is enough in most cases. Highres fix is very hard to run and only works with 512x512 x2 upscale, anything bigger The denoise setting isn't what slows it down exactly. That's what makes me feel that my latent model is broken. Turn down the denoising strength quick fix if/when UI's integrate the SD 2. fix? Set 30 steps as well (or in A1111 it is 0 which means keep the same as base). At higher denoising (0. Adjusting denoising higher often fixes the rough or blurry edges, but Hey Guys. 0 activate ultimate upscale script, select upscaler of your preference, don't forget to set target size (by default it takes target size from img2img size which is annoying), optionally you can change tile width to 768 and enable some seam fix but in my experience seams barely visible (I didn't It's fine as long as the input and output have the same ratio. 4 & 70% NAI Model hash: e84453c8 Highres fix Denoising strength: 0. What do the "Scale Latent" and "Denoising strength" settings (under This is exactly what I'm dealing with. 0 if the base resolution is not too high) because it allow you to use greater batch sizes, and has virtually no processing time cost. highres fix is just to stop twins and completely mutated strangeness, multiple landscapes and strange perspecives caused by 1. 6, Hires upscale: 2 (3 for the first image), Hires upscaler: Latent I've started posting polished generations (NSFW) on my Twitter and Pixiv if you want to check them out. Now we can choose the resolution of the first pass, and select how much the image will change with respect to the original (a value of 0 in Denoising strength simply will rescale the picture and will loose quality, values close to 1 will create many changes in the picture and the result will be close as if the Highres. So what do I do when I use high. So if you dial down the Denoising strength to around 0. 1 Model: 768-v-ema studio medium portrait of Brad Pitt waving his hands, detailed, film, studio lighting, detailed iris, symmetrical circular eyes reflecting the environment, natural color, dramatic highlights, light, shadow, relaxed, detailed skin, symmetrical ears and face shape, 90mm lens, by Martin Schoeller, looking I understand what's everyone's talking about about the Denoise strength but look at this workflow: workflow. 5 (No Scale latent) Embedding: Asanagi /r/StableDiffusion is back open after the protest of Reddit killing open API access, which will bankrupt app developers, hamper moderation, and exclude blind users from the site. 4 and below, but you have to try out yourself what works best in the current case. And also we will compare 2 of them (one latent and one non-latent) with different hi-res steps /r/StableDiffusion is back open after the protest of Reddit killing open API access, which will bankrupt app developers, hamper moderation, and exclude blind users from the site. Upscale x2 and 30 steps. 4 Add the detail lora tweaker to your prompt with 0. Upscaling (Asking for feedback) 50, Sampler: Euler, CFG scale: 10, Seed: 3651570767, Size: 960x1280, Model hash: 431d5e9e, Model: BerryHD, Denoising strength: 0. I hope this helps anyone who may have been struggling like I was, with the new hires. 65 denoising strength and keep hi res steps 15-20 Reply reply More replies More replies. /r/StableDiffusion is back open after A bit off topic, I understand the workflow with Comfy + refiner requires only one "click", but how does the the refiner steps compared to img2img + denoise strength in a1111? With the latter seems more control , since the denoise Before: highres fix always did half the steps from the firstpass. This way, you will care about Denoising strength only! Thanks! After your exploration, which denoising strength do you select for your high-res image? High denoising does create different images. 3x (or whatever works for you for a final size) and denoising strength 0. For the general upscale I tend to use 4xUltraSharp, again at 2x. Adjust the widh and high to double dimension. I can get great results upscaling using High-Res Fix in txt2img. HighRes-Fix Script Constantly distorts the image, even with the KSampler's denoise at 0. 2 and see if the problem persist (normally any other than Euler A will display this artifacts) To understand the new highres fix we have to explain a couple terms: Firstpass = simply an image generated without highres fix enabled. Do you observe the same? Hires. Denoise Change: The denoising strength can be adjusted for each loop, allowing users to strike a balance between preserving details and reducing artifacts. These my denoise test: As you can see, image don't change too much,i like that. 1 until you like it. Thing is, you don't need to deal with all the shit from the hires fix hack, which highres fix is img2img. 5 or 1280px for SDXL) is generated first, then in a second step, the image is upscaled and improved with img2img with a low Denoise strength 0. Reply Locke_Moghan Experiments with highres. fix is quick and skips steps 2 and 3 (meaning also you have to try and do precision work on txt2img, which is harder / RNG) but it will lack the quality when compared to something that Denoising strength over 0. Reply reply If so, I would recommend decreasing the denoising strength of the second sampler (and potentially increasing the steps but that's always iffy) Reply reply View community ranking In the Top 5% of largest communities on Reddit. I am trying to do a highres fix but i can't get it to work, i believe i have the correct structure but the result is . 35 denoise. 45 almost always changes the picture, it's often better to use 0. 3That will do it. 5, I would use 20-30 steps and then hi-res fix 2x for like half the number of steps and less then 0. Something that i don't think a lot of People realize: different samplers require different levels of highres fix denoising strength for optimal results. Also, the default upscaler (Latent) is bad. 🎉 Ultimate SD Upscale Bit of an old thread this so not sure if it'll get read but I find 8xNMKDFaces to add fantastic amounts of detail into the hires fix at 2x upscale 0. 7 and a scale of 2. I know about "high-res fix" and in my understanding, a appropriately-sized image for the model (say 768px for SD1. Do you observe the same? A low denoising strength (0. 5 de-noising strength. it didn’t occur to me that my denoising strength might be too high during I came up with a simple formula: Conditioning = Denoising / 2. Cond. fix improve the quality of the image even at 512? Particularly the deformities. Is there some other setting I need to change, or what? The tile I think a good workflow could be create 2 renders with different denoising strengths and photobash your way to a final picture. 4 (model page nsfw)highres fix and face restoration turned off Used this VAE. 4. DPM++ 2S a Karras, CFG scale: 10, Seed: 46681179, Size: 1024x512, Model hash: e9ce178021, Model: rmadartSD15_50, Denoising strength: 0. Denoising determines how much it mixes between the first and second. A regular generation. Once toggling Highres fix, you should see First Pass Width/Height and Denoising Strength I keep seeing posts where people generate super high-res images (8k or whatever) and I'm wondering how that actually works. This does not offer what the "hires fix" option does in img2img. I came up with a simple formula: Conditioning = Denoising / 2. fix. 3, there is not much different between using a Highres fix VS an Upscaler. 25, 1. You can find the script it in extensions when you update Automatic, Web and instructions; /r/StableDiffusion is back open after the protest of Reddit killing open API access, which will bankrupt app developers, hamper moderation, and exclude blind users from the site. [Feature Request]: Return highres fix specific resolution. 5 to get a decent result. fix: Empty = always set to 1. Found a pretty good way to get good pics without highres fix : you generate normal 512 img, send it to img2img. I've tested on 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 with the same denoising strength, and they all look The default Hires upscaler now used by Hires fix is 'Latent. This way, you will care about Denoising At lower denoising strength (up to and including 0. my Workflow: 3x3 batch of 512x512px Pictures, Picked the best, Copy seed, Paste seed and klick on hires. Euler/ancestral for example works best at around 0. 0. I just tested new high res fix and it work exactly like the old one with same image result this is the same concept of highres fix (and i really wish that highresFIX was a button and not a check box to highresFIX after the inference) is basically an img2img tab with a upscale choice in the middle, when in img2img an upscale method is not given (out than crop/resize/latent upscale) Highres. 6, try high-res with steps 0 but denoising 0. But my friends asked me, why do There is not, or I have not found the 'hires. fix negative side effect probably. 2. The final HiRes. After that repeat again. Experiment with it and see what works. 5, sometimes 2. 5 denoising strength Reply uncletravellingmatt • I was under the impression that you get gaussian noise added to the image with all upscalers, but that latent upscale is more creative (and requires higher denoise strength), because the latent representation is not designed for being scaled and thus is effectively damaged by that, so SD ends up having to be more creative to fix it. So you can configure any of them to be faster than the other. It is observed that at low denoising strength of 0. Use /r/StableDiffusion is back open after the protest of Reddit killing open API access, which will bankrupt app developers, hamper moderation, and exclude blind users from the site. It can be used with or without the SD Upscale script, high denoising strength, and even in conjunction with other CN units. I used lantent upscale 2x for hires fix. 2 or so) to keep most of the source image intact. The algorithm will try to upscale your original image using Highres. 3x upscale (you'll be upscaling again later, so no need to go nuts here) and 0. Don't use it again for the general upscale though because you'll end up with a lot of dithering and noise. You'll get a lot of ghosting because of the ControlNet, but that's okay. There First Hires Fix with Latent(bicubic antialiased) at 0. decoded_samples, seeds, subseeds Turn on highres fix with a 1. 44, personally, and I've seen some people say they go lower than that. Increasing that fixed it. 5 bad generation from halfway-Details in comments Use 4xEsrgan as upscaler and max 0. 3 or less depending on a bunch of factors) and a non-latent upscaler like SwinIR to a slightly higher resolution for inpainting. fix I usually go with DMP++2M Karras at 30 steps. If it is the hi-res fix option, the second image subject repetition is definitely caused by a too high "Denoising strength" option. 2 denoising strength sampler euler a rest images are just upscaled. I'm still tinkering around with it, but if I can find a reliable workflow I'll add it as a quick preset to the Unprompted extension. #6248. But low denoising strength does result in very blurry images in my case. Experiments with highres. The default (which I think is 0. 'Latent(bicubic antialiased)' is my favorite. From what I can gather, the tiles used in the upscaling process aren't "meshing/blending" seamlessly, like what happens when you do txt2img and use highres. Example with 40 steps: 40 steps first for firstpass then 20 steps for the secondpass Now: if Hires steps = 0, it does the same steps as the firstpass. Then the high res fix come in and scale up. I think going forward, will use highres fix with only high denoising strength, to achieve better details in simple generations Part of my workflow involves highres fixing at varing denoise strengths (generally 0. Load the result into img2img and set "resize by" 1. 8) and merging the results together in post. fix change. And denoise at 0. fix: Lowest = set to 1-Denoising/4 Upscale pro tip: use highres fix first x2, denoise between 0. Image 1 As people suggested, you need to use highres fix. It was happening because the denoising strength for Hires. I leave this at 512x512, since that's the size SD does best. Include expressions in your prompts. What's the difference, and why would we want fractal nightmare features? /r/StableDiffusion is back open after the protest of Reddit killing open API access, which will bankrupt app developers, hamper In Automatic1111 Deforum extension, they don't have denoise parameter, but they have "Strength schedule" in "Keyframes" Tab. Use width and height to set the tile size. Forge has this Highres fix button but for some reason it now started to crash when I try to use it on a generated image. I use . You'll need to increase the steps as it'll apply the "Denoising strength" to it. EDIT: if you can't upscale it without medvram, is probably because you are using the LDSR upscaler (which is the best, but also the highest in VRAM consumption set bigger denoise strength, you can try even 1. I keep my denoising strength at 0. 6 strength Set the highres fix to Latent Nearest exact, 2x, 0. But otherwise, your Inpainting conditioning mask strength will be:. 5. fix option wasn't active). res. I'm running on 6Gb, using R-ESRGAN 4x+ as upscaler. you are seeing with img2img is likely due to a combination of how much the size is changing, the CFG scale, and denoising strength. 5x with highres fix, then 3x or 2x with upscale but there's no limit but i find hard to work images above 3000x4000 Not what I wanted though. If the image generated is good enough, I then use just a 4x One thing to explore is the steps in high. 4 to 0. 4-0. So pay attention on upscale you chose and multiplier value. 4 Denoising strength: 0. . When ever I use hires fix to upscale an image it usually produces blur images and if I try to increase the denoising strength it generates disproportional images. Used SD upscale script for first 2 images, upscaled initial outputs with topaz gigapixel (standard model) then ran SD upscale with none upscaler selected, for 150 steps at 0. 2 Ultimate SD upscale upscaler: [your upscaler] Ultimate These seem better for upscale without change base image at high denoise. For my second comparison article I decided to compare the denoising strength when using Hi-Res fix. 51 denoising. i’m still trying to figure out the best settings for it. CFG scale: 5. in the prompt. 6-0-7 for best results You may need to reduce "Denoising strength" for the SD Upscale if you're getting odd artefacts. Reply reply Random prompts breaking with 2 Pass Highres Fix . Fix fixes this with a 2-step process: Generate at the base resolution for the overall composition, upscale, then do basically an img2img on the upscaled image. I have a Problem with the new hires. . 6, Seed: 3915939357, Face restoration: CodeFormer, Size I made a detailed video about hires fix. yeah, and it's not even the problem, the problem is the denoising strength, latent high-res needs between 0. 1. fix with the settings descripted in this Post. Highres. fix) do in the Automatic1111 repo? Trying to understand when to use Highres fix and when to create image in 512 x 512 and use an upscaler like BSRGAN 4x or other multiple option available in extras tab in the UI. high quality, 8k, photo Since the start of SD I've actually only been interested in photorealistic images and I'm getting the exact same Photorealism results without the negative prompts and without high quality, 8k, photo etc. Try SwinIR and see if that helps. Based on my testing, the recommended 0. that should stop it being distorted, you can also switch the upscale method to bilinear as that may work a bit better. Auto1111 model : hassanblend1. fix is a convenience feature that just puts that entire process in one place where you can do it with one click once it's set up. As for steps, I don't feel they make much of a difference. 3-0. It seems only available while the checkbox on high res fix is on That's because it is only important (in the txt2img tab) for high-res fix. Fractalization/twinning happened at lower denoising as upscaling increased Latent upscaler = any upscaler with "latent" in the name Non-latent upscaler = any upscaler without "latent" in the name So especially if you are trying to capture the likeness of someone, I would lower the Denoising in highres fix to around . Also there is a bit of Hi-Res steps comparison as well. fix denoising, low steps and prompt wide emphasis to Upscaler set to "Latent" for Hi-Res Fix appears not only to add detail, it hallucinates bizarre additional fractal nightmare features. Secondpass (highres fix pass) = the processing pass that goes through img2img and that upscales the firstpass, to create a higher resolution image with more detail and gives the final result. So if you were generating 1kx1k image now and you put 1kx1k in the height / width field now and then high res fix it to 2x, you are now generating 2k x2k image which cause you to run out of memory. ckpt if that could be selected for highres fix Insightful results. you can probably push it to 600pixels on the long side and only get a few duplicates. 6-0. Open comment sort options make sure the second sampler after your latent upscale is above 0. /r/StableDiffusion is back open after the protest of Reddit killing open Something that i don't think a lot of People realize: different samplers require different levels of highres fix denoising strength for optimal results. latent upscale introduces noise as I said in other posts here. So if you want to have low denoise - that would mean higher value if "Strength schedule". When Cond. 0 upscaler using x4-upscaler-ema. 25-0. I think any visible difference in face itself is due to denoising strength. my new upscaled Picture is totally different to the one before with the same seed. skip the highres fix, go strait to img2img, click the script dropdown menu at the bottom, choose "SD upscale", the select the 4x-Ultra IMHO the best use case for Latent upscalers is in highres fix, with a reasonable upscale (1. Reply reply 1355964758, Size: 1024x1024, Model hash: 31e35c80fc, Model: sd_xl_base_1. fix strength (for sd-v1-5-inpainting) on txt2img and img2img tabs. 3 as denoise strength. What do the "Scale Latent" and "Denoising strength" settings (under Highres. (or else it'll get cropped to match the resized output) tl;dr just use the "scale by" slider, keep the "resize width to" and "resize height to" slider at 0 How to do hires-fix properly for SDXL? Share Add a Comment. 0, effectively turning off mask strength feature;; Cond. fix was set to 0. View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. If you can't go any larger in your first pass, then your two options are UltimateSD Upscale at as high as high denoise as you can get away with, along with ControlNet Tile, or Thanks! After your exploration, which denoising strength do you select for your high-res image? High denoising does create different images. I think denoising strength is set to 0. 75) is way too high. e. img2img although I'm using automatic1111 and I can't use the slider for denoising strength if i turn off the high res fix. 7, Hires upscale: 2, Hires steps: 20, Hires upscaler: ESRGAN_4x Instead, what you can do is use the highres fix. You dont select an upscaler by Denoising strength: 0. ' I don't often see it work with denoising strengths less than 0. Setting denoising to 0 will have no effect on the image, and Steps: 28 Sampler: Euler a CFG scale: 11 Seed: 987074583 Size: 1216x1536 Model used: 30% SD 1. 0, Denoising strength: 0. 4 - 0. Try lo lower it, starting from 0. It should fix most of your problems, however those problems will increase exponentially the more you go about 512 in any direction. Hit generate. That way you can run the same generation again with hires fix and a low denoise (like 0. this one was without scale latent and 0. Adaptive change: The script adjusts the amount of resolution increase per loop based on the average intensity of the input image. 7 by default, and for me, that's way too high. 1 to 0. I'm wondering if there's a way to batch-generate different highres fix versions of an image with varying parameters for the highres fix itself, that is, the same image in all respects but with a different denoising strength, highres upscaler, etc. Increasing the width/height on the last step may help too. yoyeieu sbdztv drnig gpps ejso dbjc uuw ncra qkwh fhfj